Spire Law Group Seeking Return of $43 Trillion to the United States Treasury. Piggybankblog posted on 10/25/12 Cross linked with. Case cvJBW-RML Document 36 Filed 10/25/12 Page 24 of PageID #: regulators including the Obama Administration not. Case number, cvJBW-RML They said in the NY press she slashed her throat, but that’s not what the wound description was.
|Published (Last):||27 December 2004|
|PDF File Size:||20.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.88 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Plaintiffs did not know the massive scheme that Case 1: The Defendants entered into a series of agreements between and among each other to engage in a conspiracy to violate 18 U. ByCountrywide was the largest U. As a result of the foregoing acts of conversion and fraud, the Plaintiffs have lost all or a substantial portion of the equity invested in their houses and suffered reduced credit ratings and increased borrowing costs, among other damages described herein.
Further, those Defendants that did not actively perform the acts or omissions described here did affirmatively aid and abet the other Defendants in the performance of such acts or omissions, before, during or after the fact. VO is a resident of the State of California and had no.2-cv-04269-jbw-rml mortgage loan that was originated or serviced by one of the Defendants herein. A is an Unknown Business Entity located in Brazil. Further, the Defendants knew at the time of suppression and concealment that no.12-cv-04269-jbwr-ml suppression and concealment would cause each Plaintiff to act in a way that was injurious to him while at the same time being profitable to the Defendants.
Removing The Shackles: $43Trillion lawsuit- here’s the details
These acts, including use of fraudulently conveyed and transferred money constitutes repeated and related predicate acts of. As is clear from the mounting number of federal and state enforcement actions against Defendants, it is now widely recognized that they have committed numerous illegal acts in the process of operating their mortgage businesses. But seeing lawsuits of this size, almost three times the GDP of the United States, the financial collapse must be close.
The Defendants have concealed the stolen property and other criminally derived proceeds of the illegal scheme since the dates upon which a the banking solvency requirement legally implemented by United States of America on October 19,had been broken and b the TARP program crossed the line of illegality and began nno.12-cv-04269-jbw-rml utilized for personal profit during the first quarter of Assassination and brute intimidation are common strategies for the ruling class to use on people who may threaten their agenda.
Defendants have induced the Plaintiffs into allowing their loans to go into default by telling Plaintiffs it was a requirement for becoming eligible for a loan modification You decide November 16, Uncategorized 30 April Fools!
Half of them died there. Furthermore, venue is proper because all defendants agreed and co-conspired to the fraudulent transfers and subsequent transfers arising out of the tortious activity caee in the State of New York described herein.
Full text of “Spire Law Federal Complaint in New York Oct 26, “
The predicate acts progressed in a logical fashion as the illegal scheme expanded from its core in New York, New York, as it fed off monies advanced to it by drug cartels, terrorists, Plaintiffs, American citizens and ultimately the Defendants raid of the fed through bailouts, TARP programs and midnight money printing exercises at the Fed with all Defendants herein assuring that the official Obama administration would have plausible deniability.
This Defendant is fully subject to jurisdiction in this action Case 1: Related publications Share Embed Add to favorites Comments. As set forth in the Fifth Cause of Action, the Defendants used fraud and artifice to lure borrowers into defaulting upon their mortgages by promising them loan modifications when they had no intention of providing such loan modifications. Defendants failed to disclose this material information to the Defendants, or omitted critical elements from the disclosures that were made.
The Defendants not only covered up the poor quality of casee loans and the liquidity crisis they created, they intentionally misrepresented no.12-cv-04269-jbwr-ml the public, in statements and in public filings, the nature of those loans in an effort to further defraud the public into continuing to borrow money and put their assets at risk.
Defendants herein include some of our leading financial institutions — institutions upon which the Plaintiffs thought they could rely, and did in fact rely upon. Bush nor George W.
Tag Archives: Case No. 12-cv-04269-JBW-RML
Plaintiffs allege that each of the wrongful acts or omissions described above was performed by each Defendant herein, named or unnamed, or was ratified and adopted by each Defendant after its occurrence. Accordingly, the Dodd-Frank Legislation is either unconstitutional on its face, or is unconstitutional as it has been applied.
According to mainstream accounts the children’s nanny is responsible for the murders, allegedly stabbing both children. As set forth in the Fifth Cause of Action, the Defendants used fraud and artifice to lure borrowers into defaulting upon their mortgages by promising them loan modifications when they had no intention of providing such loan modifications. Plaintiffs allege that each of the wrongful acts or omissions described in this Cause of Action was either performed by each Defendant herein, named or unnamed, or ratified and adopted by each Defendant after its occurrence.
Attorney fees as authorized and provided for by statute, contract or otherwise; and For the appointment of a receiver and injunctive relief as this Court deems appropriate under the applicable causes of action against defendants named therein; 9.
Other private information of certain Plaintiffs taken by Defendants in violation the provisions of the United States Constitution, as alleged below conversion ; e.
Found this in body of complaint, ” In fact, the appraisals were inflated.
The gigantic network of Defendants Case 1: Earthquakes are also occurring in Southeast Asia. Further, Defendants are not the authorized representative or agent for the holders or owners of the promissory notes in question. Financial institutions, lawyers and accountants in New York, as well as interstate and international telephone, facsimile, Email, wire transfer and encrypted White House and Fed communications from no later than until the present.
This system led to the Defendants making multiple sales of the same promissory notes to multiple MBS pools.